Motor Mount differences???

Colin · September 16, 2002, 11:19pm

i was wondering if someone out there could point out all the motor mount differences between the 90-91 and 92-93 tegs.
-i know some of the mounts are different, but which ones?
-are any of the brackets that bolt to the motor/tranny different? or is it just the physical rubber mount that you replace that is different.

reason i’m asking is because i’ve got some mounts laying around and need to know which ones i can use.

thanks.

XDEep · September 17, 2002, 5:19am

i think the only difference is between the manual vs. auto mounts. look in the helms. the front mount on mine says AT, which i would assume stands for auto tranny

system · September 17, 2002, 6:05am

The driver’s side engine mount is different… If u wanna, check out acuraautomotiveparts.net and look at the difference in mounts on their handy little maps.

Harry

system · September 17, 2002, 6:07am

And actually, call them up and ask them because I got the wrong mount 2 times because I said “I need a 93 integra driver’s side mount” and then the guy was like: “what’s your vin number?” I told him and he was like: “Oh… you need a different one.” so I dunno. the wrong one looked like it woulda fit my 90, but I’m not sure I never really tried.

Harry

Colin · September 17, 2002, 6:16am

Originally posted by Aut0tek
[B]The driver’s side engine mount is different… If u wanna, check out acuraautomotiveparts.net and look at the difference in mounts on their handy little maps.

Harry [/B]

those pics on acuraautomotiveparts are pretty much useless. they are too small to be able to tell a difference in anything. Plus it only shows one mount for the driver side… and it shows two for the rear mount (possibly one if for auto?? they didn’t specify).

anyone out there have some actualy hands on experience with this…i’d like to hear what differences you know of.

VTEC-DA9 · September 17, 2002, 6:27am

Colin,

All I know is that there is a difference between auto vs manual. In terms of manual, for some reason or another, the GS-R Driver’s side mount is weak in appearance compared to the LS Driver’s side mount. Check with John, I think he bought both for you to look at…overall, go with the LS one…HTH

system · September 17, 2002, 4:12pm

too small? maybe you need to bump your resolution cuz they’re nice and big on my screen… I’ve got a 19" CRT running 1600x1200 which makes everything REALLY small and I can still see the difference between the 90-91 and the 92-93, and the 94-01… and the auto vs. manual… they even have one pic with the auto and the manual side by side… but whatever dude.

Colin · September 17, 2002, 6:21pm

Originally posted by Aut0tek
too small? maybe you need to bump your resolution cuz they’re nice and big on my screen… I’ve got a 19" CRT running 1600x1200 which makes everything REALLY small and I can still see the difference between the 90-91 and the 92-93, and the 94-01… and the auto vs. manual… they even have one pic with the auto and the manual side by side… but whatever dude.

maybe you’re looking at a different page. i seached for a 92 mount, and then a 91 mount…both pics that came up were the same. I can see the pic fine, its just it doesn’t show any differentiation between anything. if you’re looking at something different…please post a link.