Yo, what I’ve got here is a 91 rs teg (stock curb weight is about 2550 pounds) and the following are being done:
-B16a engine and tranny swap
-CTR cams (thinking about using the CTR’s with B16a valvesprings)
-tanabe catback
-DC header 4-2-1 (might use another brand)
-short ram intake
-75hp wet shot
Here is the stuff that is done to the car:
-entire stereo and alarm removal (wiring, speakers, etc.)
-carbon fiber hood (still looking for one, but definitely a must)
-removal of spare tire crap
I just wanna surely run some 13’s. Should I expect better, or is this the fastest that it will go? I plan on putting this thing on a chassis dyno to see how it all works out. I want to get the car weighing around 2450 pounds. This is definitely going to be a daily driver.
How about with 11.0:1 cr? I mean, the motor should be able to turn 8500 with better cams and springs, so I should be able to make power. I suppose that I am going to have to rely upon gear ratio for my torque. I want to run 13’s.
I plan on making my teg alot lighter. I don’t mean gutting it either. There is a shop with a DynoJet right down the road from where I live. I plan on running 13’s, and doing it reliably. I chose the B16a mainly since it can be wound up really high, and for the price (huh huh), you can’t really beat it.
I don’t have another LS motor readily available, and no I cannot take my cars LS motor out of service for that long.
The B16 route is a cheaper route and I don’t have to worry about high rpm failure quite as much.
Less money spent at a machine shop.
A complete VTEC cylinder head with everything including the intake manifold is about the same price as a complete B16a engine with 35,000 miles on it.
With the money left over that I save from not going the gsr route, I can put into building upon the B16a route. The outcome will be me outrunning the gsr route.
I am not directing this towards anyone, but less torque requires a numerically higher gear set. I think I can go 13’s with this thing. I’m a damned good driver and I know I am, so I think that 13’s is definitely attainable.
Let’s be honest here, no matter how feasible turbocharging may be on the surface, it always has its downfalls. Here’s some of the hazards:
-hacking up the front clip of my car to make room for turbo setup.
-running a smaller capacity radiator
-hours and hundreds of dollars worth of ecu development
-I would need a large cash pool to buy replacement parts in case of failure.
-and the list goes on.
Do I really need this on a daily driver? I don’t need these kinds of problems. It would be cool if I didn’t have to drive and average of 50-60 or sometimes more miles every day. In fact, I would probably have already gone the turbo route if it wasn’t for the daily driving situation. I know that I cannot outrun a turbo car, but I can get at least close to some of them.
I do understand what everyone is trying to say though. Definitely not a misunderstanding at all.
maybe someday i’ll go turbo, but for now, it’s NA with a rare dose of nitrous.
I’m just not in a hurry to cut up the front of my car. I did notice however, that full-race sells a kit that doesn’t require the removal of A/C. I don’t know how they can get away with this, but I am really curious.