so I was thinking about all the problems people are saying they are having with not being able to fit the JRSC onto the DA due to the Master brake cyl being in the way.
I had thought about this for almost 30 min. And this is just an idea,
But what if a spacer was added between the manifold and SC itself
in order to lower it just under the master brake cyl.
Also an oil filter relocation kit would need to be bought.
Here is a simple MS 5 year old drawing to show what I am saying. lol
I’m no expert, but some of the things I think you would also have to address are the following:
Shorter drive belt.
Longer IM bolts to compensate for the spacer.
Enough space so that ANY engine movement wouldn’t make the belt contact the MC/Booster.
asshole face the gs-r b18c1 intake manifold sits lower in a da then any other bseries intake manifold . This is because of the funky secondaries in the b18c1 head. The throttle body is closer to the bottom of the head then the top. It looks almost as though you have the manifold upside down (compared to other bseries heads). If you use the b18c1 head in theory the supercharger would sit lower because of the lower intake manifold position THUS possibly allowing for clearance of the master cylinder. But you know i still love you in a non-faggot way morgan.
i have both downstairs, both intake ports are in the same height.
intake manifolds are different, but that’s just it… the manifolds & bolt pattern on the head/intake manifold…
in theory it would work, but then there would be more room for airflow, you would have to create a plate as how a throttle body spacer is, have holes through it where the studs are, and would have to find everything just right to take the stress that it will be put at.
the longer a pole is, a the easier it is to bend/break
the use of a b18c1 head will do nothing in allowing the jackson racing supercharger to sit lower… that is all i was trying to state. i have both a b18c1 head & a b16a2 head downstairs. comparing both isnt that hard to see which will sit lower or higher. designs for the jackson racing supercharger from the gsr to the b16 are not very different either. changes are the flange where different holes are, and maybe port size.
[SIZE=“4”]The JRSC replaces the Intake manifold.[/SIZE] Unless I’m totally going blank.
therefor it doesnt matter what intake mani it had stock.
theJunkman :whip:
And incase you dont understand, which seems to be the case.
The gsr IM sits lower due to the design. NOTHING with the ports on the head.
It has to do with the IM wraping downward rather than like the B16 upward.
And even further more, if you still dont understand. Here are pics.
JDM B18C
JDM B16A
Understand? Or are ya still :gay:
So wether you have a B16a or a B18C1 in a da. you will still hit the same problems.
Junkman. I’m a 05 member who is 17. And your an 01 member. :owned:
Hey go fuck yourself. The assholeface comment was for krazeteggie. There was a thread pencil dick in which someone made a jackson racing supercharger fit into a da. I’m 99% sure it was done using a b18c1 engine and relocating the master cylinder. If not I’m mixing up the numerous threads and theories over the last 4 years WHERE YOU WERENT HERE in which everything from using a b18c1 engine because of the manifold size and orientation, to using a jdm integra , again because of where the master cylinder would be located in the engine bay.